Author: Jeroen Bouterse

“Oh, the humanities!”

New 3QD-column:

The Big Bang Theory has been one of the most successful sitcoms in TV history. Last month it ended. In many ways, it ended a long way from where it had begun; many commentators have noticed how the show has evolved together with cultural norms in the past decade. Its first seasons milked gender-stereotypes to a toe-wrenching extent; later, the main cast included more women, and generally changed its tone on gender and science – even making it a theme in several episodes.

Still, a sitcom like BBT needs its stereotypes, and BBT’s idea of geek culture did remain stereotypical; if not on the level of gender, then in other ways that I want to explore here.

More here.

On Visiting Max Weber’s Gravestone

New 3QD-column:

In the school vacation, I finally decided to go on what is probably my only-ever academic pilgrimage: I visited Max Weber’s tombstone in the Bergfriedhof cemetery in Heidelberg.

I had intended to go for some time. In my original plans, I’d go on foot (from the Netherlands) like a proper pilgrim, but after years of failing to go through I had come to realize that was not going to happen anytime soon. So I went by train. Which was too easy; I stood next to the monument before I knew it. I’m still coming to grips with the fact that only on the first time can you do a thing like this properly – that is, with enough ascetic self-denial to mark the purposefulness of your actions – and that I messed up that one chance.

Oh well. Isn’t it fitting to feel the charismatic potential of this particular relic being sapped by the very efficiency of modernity – the stahlhartes Gehäuse of the InterCity Express, working unfailingly to disenchant this tiny part of the world, too. Except for one detail, which I’ll get to later.

More here

Socrates and his Bones

New 3QD-column:

When Socrates’ students enter his cell, in subdued spirits, their mentor has just been released from his shackles. After having his wife and baby sent away, Socrates spends some time sitting up on the bed, rubbing his leg, cheerfully remarking on how it feels much better now, after the pain.

The Phaedo, Plato’s vision of Socrates’ final conversation with his students before drinking the hemlock, is a literary piece overflowing with meaning and metaphor. Its main topic is the immortality of the soul. Socrates’ predicament provides not just the occasion but also a handy analogy: Socrates sees his death as the release of the soul from the bonds of the body (67d). His students are not so sure.

With Plato, every moral, existential and philosophical question is in the end related to a problem of knowledge. So when, in the last hours of his earthly life, halfway through Plato’s dialogue, Socrates suddenly starts off on a lecture about the epistemological paradoxes of the natural sciences, no-one is too surprised. After all, the question whether death is bad for you naturally flows into the question whether the soul can actually die, and therefore into the question what kind of thing the soul actually is, and what we can say about it and how. It is Socrates’ excursion into science that I want to zoom in on here.

More here.

That Time Petrarch Yelled At A Doctor For Dozens Of Pages

New 3QD-column:

I don’t know how much you know about Petrarch. My guess is that you know him as a poet, primarily for his sonnets. Maybe you associate him with early Italian humanism and its reinvigorated dedication to the wisdom of classical Antiquity. Or perhaps you think of him as someone who expressed transcendental truths about the soul and its searching and wandering nature.

All of this may be true. As of recently, however, I can’t help but think of him as that guy who spent dozens of pages (more than 80, in a modern printed edition) yelling at a physician.

Or yelling at all physicians, possibly. Petrarch is slightly abstruse about the extent to which he seeks to put down physicians in general, or some subclass of physicians, or this singularly annoying physician in particular.

More here

Why Teach Math? Two Voices From The 1920s

New 3QD-column: Tatiana Ehrenfest-Afanassjewa and Eduard Jan Dijksterhuis on intuition and abstract thought in math class.

“Am I ever going to use this later?” As a math teacher, I seem to be getting this question about once a month (which is actually less frequently than I would have predicted). It is asked with varying degrees of openness to the idea that a satisfying reply is even conceivable, but almost invariably by students who are probably justified in believing that their tertiary education or future career is going to involve preciously few linear equations indeed.

See here.

Atheism and Historical Awareness

My new 3QD-column (published last week) discusses atheism and historical awareness, departing from John Gray’s Seven Types of Atheism.

It is simultaneously awkward and exciting to read about your own consciously and responsibly adopted beliefs as something to be anatomized. It is also something atheists are not always much disposed to. On the contrary, perhaps: many forms of atheism present themselves as a consequence of free thought, of emancipation from tradition. The internal logic of their arguments prescribes that while religious beliefs, being non-rational, are in need of cultural or psychological explanation, atheism is really just what you will gravitate towards once you finally start thinking. One question here will be whether this is necessarily the case.

More here.

Update: 3QuarksDaily

Since August of this year, I proudly write a 4-weekly column for 3QuarksDaily, mostly about science and religion, and the relation between the sciences and the humanities. (I’m one of a few dozen of columnists rotating to write an original piece every Monday.) Links to the first four posts below:

1) A ‘Gulf Of Misunderstanding’: Steven Pinker And The Two Cultures

2) Letters In The Age Of Science: A 19th-Century Case For Optimism

3) History Of Science And The ‘Conflict Thesis’

4) Bad Arguments On Bad Arguments: The Sokal Squared Hoax As An Unfortunate Cliché

More to follow, probably!

Twee manieren om je rug recht te houden James Comey, A higher loyalty; Jordan Peterson, 12 rules for life

Ik heb dit weekend twee boeken gelezen die in mijn systeem allebei onder de categorie ‘zelfhulp’ vallen: James Comeys A Higher Loyalty en Jordan Petersons 12 Rules for Life.

Continue reading “Twee manieren om je rug recht te houden James Comey, A higher loyalty; Jordan Peterson, 12 rules for life“

Math as an Art Paul Lockhart’s Mathematician’s Lament

Paul Lockhart starts his “Mathematician’s Lament” (later expanded into a book under the same title, but I’ll be discussing the shorter article here) by comparing math class to a misshapen music or art class. Suppose that in music class, enjoying actual music is supposed to be too advanced for children, so they are made to start with memorizing the circle of fifths and pointing the stems of quarter-notes the right way; or suppose that in art class, painting is postponed until after preparatory “Paint-by-Numbers” classes. This, Lockhart suggests, is how math class works; it stifles creativity and natural curiosity and therefore goes against the spirit of mathematics.

Continue reading “Math as an Art Paul Lockhart’s Mathematician’s Lament“